INTRODUCTION: THE PARALLELS BETWEEN THE
CHALLENGER AND COLUMBIA
THE WISDOM OF MAE BRUSSELL
by Virginia McCullough
As the world joins in mourning the brave astronauts who perished aboard the Columbia, we should learn from the past. There are numerous parallels between the demise of the Columbia and the tragic explosion of the Challenger that cold Tuesday morning, January 28, 1986.
Both events occurred shortly after Super Bowl Sundays. Presidents Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush had just delivered their State of the Union addresses to a nation mired in a depressed economy, facing an ever increasing deficit, and standing on the edge of war. Both Reagan and Bush were intent on spending billions of dollars on an unproven program called "Star Wars". Both space ships were the oldest and, in Challenger's case, the most troubled in the fleet. Both catastrophes left NASA with three remaining shuttles and those shuttles would be shifted to military priorities.
Could it be that both the Columbia and the Challenger fell victim to national leaders whose priorities abandoned the brave souls who rode these fragile vehicles into the heavens? Both presidents who would voice their sorrow over the heroes' loss also held the ultimate power to protect the astronauts by assuring the safety of NASA space ships. Deeds speak with a great more moral integrity then words of sorrow mouthed after the sacrifice of brave space adventurers. Neither president acted to insure the safe return of those who risked their lives to push the limits of man's knowledge.
The well known saying that "if we do not learn from history, then we are bound to repeat it" applies to the tragic loss of both Columbia and the Challenger. The following article by Mae Brussell predicts the future and we are living it now.
NASA'S CHALLENGER R.I.P.
January 28, 1986
by Mae Brussell © 1986 Originally written for The Realist
William Rogers, Chairman of the Commission appointed by President Ronald Reagan to investigate the causes of the Challenger shuttle explosion on January 18, 1986, stated that "A serious deficiency in the flawed decision making process was responsible" for the tragic event that occurred on Tuesday morning, January 28, 1986."
That makes a good and safe cover story. Human error did it.
What if the demise of the Challenger, with its seven member crew, wasn't an error?
Mike Royko, columnist for the Chicago Tribune, wrote, "Somebody should check the laws of Florida and the federal laws for criminal liability. There could be a manslaughter case here."
Senator Donald W. Riegle, D. Michigan, suggested that, "one can only assume they, the President's Commission, are hitting upon things that are so disturbing they feel they can't share them with the public."
A NASA official was quoted as saying, "It's like an artichoke. Everyday they peel something else. The Commission has begun pointing the finger at the individuals and the procedures involved in the catastrophe and the resulting picture isn't pretty."
Every major military operation, or shift in Defense Department policies, occurs as a result of long planning.
The problems surrounding the Challenger's explosion, with the disastrous ripple effect upon the entire shuttle program, indicates the Pentagon and NASA's Star Wars operation will assure the friendly skies for their Warfare State.
Control of all space projects for the future will be in the hands of the military. Commercial and exploratory projects are now being shelved, or put on a long waiting period.
The transfer of NASA/Shuttle programs to the Defense Department was described in an article in Spaceflight, May 1982 entitled "The Military Role in the Shuttle" by Gerald L. Borrowman. The United State Department of Defense has a major role in the utilization of the space shuttle.
The first participation of the shuttle Challenger, with new Pentagon policies, became obvious in September 1983.
The Challenger "accident" may go down in history, along with the Reichstag fire, the assassination of Austrian Archduke Ferdinand, the Gulf of Tonkin incident, or the downing of the Korean Airliner 007, as a provocateur action implemented by the military in order to get tighter control of the war machinery.
Some estimated costs to activate the shuttle projects are between $2 and $10 billion dollars. It would take from four to five years.
It is impossible to believe that such a system, so huge in terms of money, plans and contracts for military purposes and spy satellites, didn't have some kind of back-up with less expensive provisions in the event of a single accident.
Making matters worse, the accident was obviously preventable.
Time and money is not thrown away so fast unless there are other major plans waiting to appear.
NASA had already ordered the shuttle program's extinction as early as 1983. The terms were an impossible situation, "pull yourself out of the red and produce more revenues of at least $2,000,000,000". Get going, or get out of the way, was the message and the pressure.
Problems related to the controversial O-ring, caused by freezing in cold weather, were a concern to NASA as early as December 19, 1982.
By February, 1983, NASA was warned, then it chose to ignore, specific problems created by lack of protection with the secondary back-up seals. Why was the shuttle program appearing to lack interest in survival of their equipment and passengers?
Memorandum detailing a "catastrophic" disaster if the shuttle was launched in less than 50 degrees Fahrenheit was presented to NASA in July 1985, and again in August 1985 by two different scientists.
Did NASA, and the Pentagon, select the time when they demanded a lunch on the coldest day in shuttle history?
The Challenger shuttle, unlike any other launch, waited outside in rain and cold for 38 days.
Television cameras focused upon the ice coating and huge icicles at the time of the launch. Ice teams were sent out the "check".
It was not always cold at Cape Canaveral.
The Rogers Commission limited their public inquiry into launching decisions to the evening of January 27th and the morning of the 28th of January 1986.
Plans for an earlier launch on Saturday, January 25th, 1986 were postponed because of dust storms in Africa and Morocco.
It is interesting that the weather, so far away, was conveyed to the launch team at the top of the their pyramid. The same decision makers couldn't see ice, or feel freezing temperature around them at Cape Canaveral.
It was not a matter of seeing or feeling the cold.
NASA experts from Huntsville, Alabama, at Marshall Space Center, literally ordered management from Morton Thiokol and Rockwell to either approve of this launch or ignored what they did not choose to hear.
Challenger would leave on the morning of January 28, 1986.
Weather was not a factor considered, then or now.
Robert Lund, Vice President for Engineering at Morton Thiokol, the company who made the controversial solid fuel boosters, was told to "stop making an engineering decision". He was supposed to change from an engineer to a manager, removing his decisions from scientist to the business world.
Lund took on two hats. One hat was as a manager, because Marshall teams at Huntsville were dangling a renewal contract for Morton Thiokol, involving $300 to $400 million a year, while forcing an about face regarding a life and death matter on safety of seven astronauts.
The other hat was military. Lund changed directions and took orders.
Life is cheap for the Pentagon.
Sunday turned out to be a fine day for a launch.
Was there too much media competition with the Super bowl Sunday, with Reagan's "teacher in space" production, after two years of publicity?
The hundreds of press, teachers, and students waiting at Cape Canaveral, could have seen a fine launch on Sunday, Monday afternoon, or even Tuesday afternoon when it was much warmer.
NASA officials had been alerted by Sunday that a cold front was coming in Monday night or Tuesday for sure. Indications were that weather was always a factor in safely launching a shuttle.
The orders to launch coincided with President Reagan's State of the Union speech before Congress.
Reagan's pet teacher, Christa McAuliffe, was superstar for this event. Would this factor be sufficient to endanger an entire shuttle history of safety?
Rumors spread through Washington, D.C. that Chief of Staff Donald Regan called Marshall Space Flight Center and ordered the "ship to fly" on the morning of January 28, 1986.
Regan, Wall Street broker from Merrill Lynch, does not know the mechanics of space travel or safety. He knows business. Billions of dollars, not lives, have a way of altering judgment. So has national security. Only the National Security Council and the Pentagon put words into Regan's mouth on shuttle matters.
A shuttle disaster would not embarrass the "Teflon president".
A shuttle "catastrophe" would be, and was, an advantage for Star Wars, SDI, and the militarization of space.
Reagan's primary goal, at the present time, is to disperse so much funds and contracts into SDI that no matter who is President, Republican or Democrat, the first strike offensive and space weapon system is in place.
Background for the SDI, and their recent announcement of laser weapons that can scorch the earth, came from the importation of 642 Nazi specialists to the United States between May 1945 and December 1952. The importees' expertise was in rockets, atomic bombe, and missiles. The United State benefited greatly from their Nazi compatriots.
Project Paperclip by Clarence Lansby, describes how Dr. Werner von Braun, Walter Dornberger, with their 640 partners, manufactured weapons from Adolph Hitler at Peenemunde and Camp Dora "with the benefit of ten thousand slaves laborers under control of the Waffen SS, the Gestapo."
Those Nazis, brought to Huntsville, Alabama, came with the idea of using space to "rule the world" by building a reflector that would kill living persons immediately. It could instantly kindle forests or turn the ocean water into steam.
It was no coincidence that the pressure to launch came from four top officials at Marshall Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama.
William Lucas, Stanley Reinartz, Lawrence Mulloy and George Hardy still arrogantly defend the launch massacre, which went against all scientific facts and warnings of exactly what would happen to the shuttle and its passengers.
Konrad Dannenbery, part of the Paperclip-Von Braun team, and George von Tiesenhousen, Nazi rocket scientists described in the Wall Street Journal the "hazards of rocketry", clearly implying that deaths go with the territory of exploration."
Remember, however, the seven murders of the astronauts were avoidable. Why couldn't they wait to launch? Tuesday afternoon was warm.
While Star Wars/ SDI has been in the minds of both the Germans and the United States Pentagon for over thirty years, it wasn't formally presented to the world until March 23, 1983.
President Reagan, with the father of the Hydrogen bomb Edward Teller by his side, coaching this event, pulled out the Paperclip ambitions and titled them SDI, The Strategic Defense Initiative.
August 30, 1983, five months after the SDI presentation, the shuttle Challenger was launched in the dark of night.
Challenger would start it's twenty-fourth and twenty-fifth orbit, making a close approach to the Korean Airliner 007. (12)
While a satellite could monitor the KAL-007 activation of Soviet defense systems, the shuttle was on one of its designated military functions. Challenger's role "extended intelligence operations with sea, land, air and space involvement". (13)
Representative Larry McDonald, chairman of the John Birch Society and Western Goals, was used in Korean KLA 007, a civilian plane used to for military purposes.
When KAL-007 was shot down by the Soviets, the arms race escalated as never before. Reagan used the deaths of 268 passengers for pushing production of MX missiles, deployment of Pershing 11 and cruise missiles in Europe, and to escalate funds for his new Star Wars, High Frontier, SDI projects.
Edward Teller was on the Board of Western Goals, a military spying data bank, with the late Larry McDonald.
The pilot of the Challenger [August 30 1983 to September 5, 1983] was Rear Admiral Richard Truly. Truly became head of Naval Space Command. Following the Challenger destruction on January 28, 1986, Truly has been appointed to replace Jesse Moore as Associate Director for Space Flight.
Jesse Moore was offered a promotion to become director of Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas, just five days before the launch tragedy. Those were the sunny days when Challenger rested before the soon-to-be-freezing launch. Remember, Moore had the final decision for a "go or no go".
1983 was also the year that Lockheed got their contract for maintenance of the shuttle system at Cape Canaveral. Lockheed's $1.2 billion, 3 year job, included readying the shuttle for each launch.
Lockheed was the contractor that built and assembled the suspect rocket booster.
Recent news accounts describe patchwork repairs on the shuttles as "Mickey Mouse" operations.
The history of Lockheed is one that hardly recommends such a sensitive position with the politicized, and overzealous NASA-wired Star Wars assured, project that is in the pocket.
The company hired to service the shuttle program, Lockheed, is best described by author Jim Hougan in his book, Spooks.
"Lockheed's chairman, Daniel J. Haughton, masterminded and raped the treasures of a dozen countries, corrupted the political processes of both hemispheres, jeopardized national security, screwed the taxpayer, destabilized the governments of three allies, undermined NATO, subverted the marketplace, boosted inflation, and stimulated suicides as far apart as Tokyo and Las Angeles."
Would Lockheed employees, with past cozy relationships with former Nazis, fascists, members of the Wafer SS, assist the SDI and militarization of space, or have any part of dismantling the civilian space program?
One Lockheed employee working on the Challenger nearly went out of his mind upon seeing the explosion. "It was my fault. I killed seven people," he screamed.
Lockheed had an unprecedented series of accidents, the most recent being where their derrick hit the Challenger, possibly weakening the side for raging fuel to enter.
There are two obvious changes in NASA, and the military space program, since January 28, 1986.
NASA is getting exposure of their bitter in-fighting, mismanagement, near accidents and horror stories on inefficiency.
The Rogers Commission, along with leaks and Congressional pressures, will uncover scandals inside the shuttle program and NASA itself.
At the same time, funding and projects for the Star Wars and SDI have escalated.
SDI is the only Pentagon project not open for any cuts at all by the Gramm-Rudman amendment. National securities hold cow, Reagan and Teller's baby, is untouchable.
Congress has been asked to spend $4.8 billion for Star Wars in 19987.
The Energy Department wants $603 million for nuclear weapons in space. That will include microwave hear, the Paperclip goals, nuclear pellets, and projects related to SDI, in case they can not pull in enough cash over the table on their own.
$50,000,000 more has been requested for nuclear weapons research. NASA and the Pentagon want a "third generation weapon, beyond the atomic and hydrogen bomb. Edward Teller is to give birth again. Ronald Reagan is the mid-wife."
Teller and Reagan have teamed up since Governor Reagan visited Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, in Berkeley, California in 1966.
NASA, rocket and missile experts, scientists, specialists in future possible nightmares, now are assured monopoly and control of space projects. Atomic bombs, Star Wars lasers, reflectors can be activated without some civilian teacher trying to explain the "humanization of space".
When one shuttle blew up, the other three were doomed for anything but military purposes.
Almost a perfect James Watt "Rainbow Coalition" went to their graves. One black, a classmate of Jesse Jackson, one Buddhist-Japanese, one Jew and two women.
If the launch explosion was no accident, and could have been prevented, was the crew handpicked for this specific voyage? Given the mentality and logic of the Reagan team, if not Reagan himself, combined with the imported Nazi space scientists still ordering when to launch, nothing is impossible or should be overlooked.
Compilation and commentary by Virginia McCullough © 2003
TAPE NO. 739 FEBRUARY 3, 1986 – WORLD WATCHERS INTERNATIONAL
WHY WAS MARTHA MITCHELL KIDNAPPED? WHY WAS PATTY HEARST KIDNAPPED? AND WHY WAS CHRISTA McAULIFFE SACRIFICED TO FURTHER THE WARFARE STATE:
1. The President’s speech scheduled for Tuesday, January 28, 1986.
It would be a shortie, an upper, a vision of family, space, Star Wars, and his teacher in space. What a cover for an education hater.
2. What the President couldn’t talk about.
The deficit, his horrendous debt, trade imbalance, farms closing, banks out of control drugs, not enough housing, medical costs, domestic failure.
3. What Reagan never liked, education for poor, minorities, masses.
Tape No. 456, 282 weeks ago. 1966 election as Governor of California. Worked with Gov. Claude Kirk, Florida, Wackenhut to break University of California and such universities. (“William Bennett”, San Francisco Chronicle by Edward Fiske, on Reagan’s secretary of education. A teacher in space vs. reality of Reagan and schools, teachers on earth.
4. Why a teacher in space?
Presidential debate with Walter Mondale. Wanted votes against Mondale. It was a political, vote-getting grab. San Jose Mercury 1/86 by Frank Greve. “The Reagan decision occurred amid a political campaign in which Mondale sought to rally teachers against the President, who cut federal aid to education by 25%.” Putting teacher in space for funds, promotion.
5. “Hitler Youth, the Duped Generation.”, Ballantine’s History, 1972, No. 6.
“Girls and boys, thrown together by crises, fear and belief in their country. Misuse made of youth’s idealism and spirit of self sacrifice, worth of a better cause than that which the Fuhrer (Reagan) offered the youth of his German (America the Beautiful”.
“McAuliffe’s fate and Regan, distressing.” Los Angeles Times 1/29/86.
6. The teacher in space, delayed five days now, same day as Reagan’s address, 1/28/86.
“Lift-off, affected by repeated delays in weather-plagued earlier mission.” “Jammed bolt keeps shuttle on ground. Much ballyhooed passenger, Christa.”
“Weather forces delay in shuttle launch.” 1/26/86. More than 600 teachers, 4,000 students from around country to watch launching. Orbiting classroom, hundreds of schools and public broadcasting.
“We’re not going to launch this thing and take any kind of risk because we have that schedule pressure.” Jessie Moore, NASA.
“Shuttle Fever Grips Nation’s Schools” Los Angeles Times 1/27/96
Los Angeles County, local schools, NASA curriculum package for students. Live broadcasts, TV camera, high priority on space exploration.
“Educator Christa” Los Angeles Times, 1/30/86. Her husband’s Virginia Military Institute class ring.
Journey in a $20,000,000,000 Conestoga wagon.
The ordinary persons view of space in $50,000,000 ship.
An ordinary person’s view for lectures, speeches, TV organizations.
Just an ordinary person with $1,000,000 free life insurance for children.
The public fundraiser, organizer for Star Wars, laser earth scorching.
Sandstorm in India, sandstorm in Casablanca, cold storm coming into Florida. Stubborn hold, workers with hacksaw, late delivery of tools, a drill with a dead battery. “Low Temperature could cause a problem with water lines.”
8. The icicles, Rockwell, the first cancellation, an hour later, the lift-off.
CBS, Dan Rather, 1/28/86. Discussion with NASA official on “seams in the fuel tank, low temperatures below 28 degrees.” Icicles on shuttle gantry, icicles on base of fuel tank, icicles on launch pad.
CNN, NASA press conference, 1/29/86. Regarding icicles. Dick Smith, NASA “Indications were that there was very little risk involved.”
“Artic Air Freezes Deep South”, Los Angeles Times, 1/28/86, Florida.
9. The shuttle blew up. What went wrong?
1. Supposed to go off at 6:38 a.m., E.S.T. Delayed an hour for “ice inspection”.
2. Shuttle delayed another hour, door, hardware repair.
3. “Three Possible Causes” Los Angeles Times, 1/30/86
(1) Icicles formed on the main fuel tank might have dislodged, puncturing the main fuel tank and letting
(2) “Ruptured seam in huge liquid fuel tank may have leaked hydrogen.”
4. Rockwell inspection, scrubbing because of ice problem. Los Angeles Times 1/30/86. “The rupture
itself might have been caused by an icicle dislodged during flight.”
TAPE NO. 740, FEBRUARY 10, 1986 – WORLD WATCHERS INTERNATIONAL
WAS THE SHUTTLE CHALLENGER SABOTAGED? A CONTINUATION OF THE DALLAS COUP. THE DEFENSE DEPARTMENT, AIR FORCE FOR THE MILITARIZATION AND CONTROL OF STARS WARS AND WWIII. REMEMBER NASA, NAZIS AND THE TORBITT DOCUMENT.
3/23/ 83 President Ronald Reagan and Edward Teller present Star Wars and SDI.
8/30/83 KAL-007 downed. Space Shuttle Challenger. McDonald sinks down.
9/18/83 New York Times “NASA’s Next Mission – Big Business in Space.” Challenger. Away from “exploration” not to commercial and military uses.
1/28/86 Challenger goes down. Vandenberg, military STAR WARS take over.
Evidence of internal warfare: NASA v. military, Pentagon, SDI elevation.
1. NASA knew of hazards, “could be catastrophic”. New York Times, 2/10/86. Warns 8/85.
“Failure of seals, to prevent flames, next to solid-fuel booster rockets.” “O-ring, defective.” Double jeopardy, sub-freezing weather.
2. Purpose of appointed commission to divert weather hazards
AP, UPI, CNN, NBC, CBS, ABC 2/6/86 and 2/7/86 “”Weather not a factor.” San Jose Mercury, 2/7/86. Freezing temperature, robbed O-ring, seal, protection.
3. Shuttle could have taken off on Sunday, weather perfect.” Washington Post 1/27/86
4. “Another shuttle Chance Bolts Away” Washington Post 1/28/86. Why delay necessary? Comedy of errors, tools, and batteries seems almost impossible.
5. “Challenger Was a Disaster Anyway” Wall Street Journal 1/28/86. List of “problems”, defects.
6. “With Shortage of Shuttle, military now has priority” New Yo9rk Times 1/31/86.
7. Unload James Watt’s Rainbow Coalition. Buddhist-Japanese, one Jew, two women and one Black. No cripples this time, just corpses. Ellison Onizuka, “secret military spy satellite mission, January 1985. Judith Resnick, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, 1974 to 1977. AIDS experiments.
8. Fight between James M. Beggs, NASA'S administrator and William Graham.
San Jose Mercury News 1/30/86. Graham joined NASA three months ago. Begg’s “space colony” vs. SDI.
9. Infighting in the White House. Star Wars, détente. State vs. Pentagon.
“Administration at War with Itself” Washington Post 1/28/86. Assistant Secretary of Defense Richard Perle, “there hasn’t been a disaster, so maybe system works.”
10. “Arms control Rasputin, Prince of Darkness, Richard Perle.” San Jose Mercury News 12/11/84.
11. Rockwell, Lockheed, Thiokol, will make Star Wars, if not new shuttle.
“50% increase for Star Wars” Los Angeles Times 1/31/86. “more NASA 2/4/86. “Air Force asks for $104.5 billion.” San Francisco Examiner. All after the explosion.
12. NASA admiral William Graham with Representative Manuel Luian, Jr., New Mexico. Los Angeles Times 1/29/86. When Challenger went down, Graham with ranking GOP on House Science, Technology.
13. “Space Invaders: Military Cowboys seek setting for Star Wars” San Francisco Examiner 1/27/86. How SDI, Air Force blow up Navy, NASA Solwind satellite. “Anti-satellite tests open Pandora’s box.” Los Angeles Times 9/22/86.
14. Destruction of booster rockets and lies that followed.
1. Los Angeles Times 1/30/86 “Going into population; 2. Time Magazine, 2/10/86. Wasn’t a danger. 3. San Jose Mercury News 1/30/86 Boosters important to finding out what happened.
15. News Groups protesting NASA’S seizure of film. New York Times 1/31/86. “NASSA knew that impounding film was illegal.”
16. Reagan’s reaction. Did “Rasputin” drug our king?” Washington Post 1/28/86.
Buchanan, “Shuttle blown up.” President: “The one with the teacher on it?” Reluctance to accept the deaths. Information from TV, not White House lines.
17. “NASA Held Up Information of Leak, Solid Fuel Three Days.” San Francisco Examiner 2/4/86
Links to “sub-freezing temperature, that is why boosters were destroyed.”
18. “NASA Failure to Communicate for Five Hours”. William Safire, Los Angeles Herald 1/30/86.
March 20, 1984, NASA directive: “No longer than 20 minute elapses, then tell.”
19.Air Force Blew Up Remote Control, Solid Rocket Booster. Newsweek 2/18/86
20. Reagan’s Commission, Chairman William Rogers, is a member of Kissinger Associates. Sundance, 11/1972. Jeff Gerth, Peter Dale Scott. William Rogers and organized crime, Mafia links to Nixon, Rebozo, Bahamas drug traffickers.
21. “Day of Minor Pre-launch Flaws” Washington Post 1/29/86. day of launch. Delayed 6.38 a.m., free3zing weather. Second hours, “fire-detection system”.
22. Accidental damage form derrick, didn’t bother to x-ray fuel tank. Newsweek 2/10/86. They didn’t really care about this old shuttle.
23. Shift of Authority to life from Jesse Moore to “others involved.” Wall Street Journal, 2/4/86. Rockwell said, “Don’t go, too cold.” Who are others?
24. “Weather has NASA Concerned, Cracks From Cold Feared.” San Jose Mercury News 2/7/86. Morton Thiokol: withstands temperature down to 40 degrees, solid rocket boosters. Night before launch, January 27, all temperatures in the 20’s.
25. “Shuttle Ready to Launch Again. Air Force Knows Cause of Explosion”
San Jose Mercury News 2/8/86. Mid-July date, after “cause located by defense department.”
26. Shuttle Contingency Plans. New York Times 1/31/86. Shifting to military space.
Dr. Hans Mark, former deputy administrator of space agency, former Secretary of Air Force, “military missions have priority”. “Three could to the job”.
27. “Solid Rocket Temperature Not Checked by NASA” Chicago Tribune, San Francisco Examiner, February 5, 1986.
NASA admitted, temperature inside booster rockets not checked before launch.
“Never considered monitoring the cold fuel package.”
“Solid fuel deteriorates in sub-freezing weather, allows flames, 6,000 degrees.”
“A burn through believes most likely cause of explosion”.
“NASA REFUSED TO RELEASE TEMPERATURE AT LAUNCH SITE BEFORE LAUNCH.”
“Weather service reported low of 23 degrees early morning, 28 degrees at the launch pad 39 B.”
“No sensors to monitor, measure fuel temperature.
TAPE NO. 741, FEBRUARY 17, 1986 – WORLD WATCHERS INTERNATIONAL
REAGAN'S STATE OF THE UNION, SPACE-STAR WARS, PENTAGON, AND FAMILY (HETEROSEXUAL) AND AIDS. THE MILITARIZATION OF SPACE AND AIDS, WITH ADVANCED GENETIC SCIENCES IN THE MIDDLE.
SOCIALIST TRIUMPHS IN PORTUGAL ELECTION San Francisco Chronicle 2/17/86. MARIO SOARES
Mario Soares first elected civilian president in 60 years.
Military dictatorship since 1926. Hitler, Mussolini, Franco emerging.
Recent elections to change USA + CIA + Nazi Gehlen coups: Argentina, Peru, Bolivia, Brazil, Ecuador, Guatemala, Iran, Nicaragua, Haiti, Greece and soon the Philippines.
Next to overthrow by elections: U.S.A., Taiwan, Chile, S. Korea.
RONALD REAGAN’S STATE OF THE UNION MESSAGE TO CONGRESS FEB. 4, 1986
WHO MADE THE DECISION, AGAINST NASA RULES, MORTON THIOKOL, ROCKWELL, TO LAUNCH JAN. 28, 1986, WHEN COLD COULD DAMAGE THE FUEL, TILES, ROCKET BOOSTER?
“Panel questions Launch Decision” Monterey Herald 2/16/86
“Move from panel investigating the explosion anyone involved in the decision to launch on a cold, frosty morning.”
“Flawed Shuttle Launch” San Francisco Chronicle 2/16/86
Richard Smith, Arnold Aldrich, William Lucas, Jesse Moore, Gene Thomas, Bob Sieck, key roles in launch control.
“NASA Manager resigns” Monterey Herald 2/17/86. Philip E. Culbertson (NASA’S OSWALD?)
“Morton Thiokol cautioned against frigid 24 degree overnight to only 38 degrees.”
“Rockwell feared icicles on pad might drop off during liftoff, damage heat protection, tiles, also seams would tear.”
“Jesse Moore, NASA shuttle director, “time to launch, everyone agreed, including the contractor”. Moore, 1/26/86 “will not be pressured”.
1. RONALD REAGAN ORDERS AIDS REPORT, GIVING HIGH PRIORITY, New York Times 2/6/86.
“Reagan asked Surgeon General to prepare a major report on AIDS”. “We are going to develop and test vaccines, and WE’RE GOING TO FOCUS ON PREVENTION”. (Prevention includes isolation, separating, identification” Reduction of 22% for 1986. From $244 million to $193 million”.
2. “DRASTIC MEASURES IN DISPUTE AIDS STUDY” San Francisco Examiner 2/9/86.
Hoover Institute, Sanford University. Advanced Investigation of Medical Science. Associate with military, biological and chemical warfare tests.
3. 1950-1970 Ft. Detrick, MD. Attack on elderly, San Francisco and Bay Area.
4. $213 million fro AIDS, DCT 2/6/86 “Combine in single office all federal programs on AIDS. National Institute for Health, Food and Drug, Center Disease Control.
II. HUGHES AIRCRAFT, HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE, DISTRIBUTION, FUNDS, PROJECTS
1. “One billion grant for biomedicine” New York Times 2/3/85. Stanford, Mass. General. AREAS OF GENETICS, IMMUNOLOGY, METABOLIC CONTROL, NEUROSCIENCE.
2. Dupont Irving Shapiro, trustee for Hughes Medical Institute.
III. ADVANCED GENETIC SCIENCES. THE WHITE HOUSE, EPA, FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION.
1. “EPA caved in to WHITE HOUSE pressure to move experiments into commercial applications.” Washington Post 10/30/86.
2. ROBERT ERNEST NAYLOR Tape No. 738, Between AGS, Rohm and Haas, Dupont.
3. “Oakland firm set out for `first” in genetics” Oakland Tribune, 10/30/85. Not Oakland. SWEDEN’S HILLESHOB AB, BELGIUM, CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS. ONTARIO CANADA. GERMAN-AMERICAN ROHM AND HAAS owns 24%.
Howard M. Goodman, PhD, Chief of Dept of Molecular Biology, Mass. General Hospital, Boston. RECIPIENT OF HUGHES MEDICAL INST. FUNDS, DUPONT LINKS.
4. “No Strawberry Fields Forever” San Francisco Chronicle 2/16/86 Calls itself “small company.”
IV. “SECRET DRUG ABOARD SHUTTLE DISCOVERY” San Francisco Chronicle 7/22/84. Johnson and Johnson.
1. “Five Firms picked to Develop New Tests for AIDS” Litton (Greek junta), Abbott, Electro-Nucleonics, TravenolGenetech, Cambridge, Mass. And E.I. Dupont Nemours and Co. DIRECT LINK BETWEEN AGS AND HUGHES MED.
2. “First Space Business” San Jose Mercury 7/9/86 Gerard O’Neill, Princeton, space and $100 billion by end of decade”. Princeton and AGST. Dyott.
3. “Hush Hush Hormone, AIDS, Shuttle factory.” Washington Post 7/17/84.
4. “Shuttle Drugs, Judith Resnick, testing next year.” Los Angeles Times 9/3/84.
V. TYLENOL SCARE, MURDERS, MADE BY JOHNSON AND JOHNSON.
2/11/86 “Tainted Tylenol linked to NY death.”
2/11/86 “Johnson and Johnson stock falls, reaction to Tylenol scare.”
2/13/86 “Sterling Drug is I.G. Farben. Allen Dulles, office of Sullivan and Cromwell. Dulles ordered 34,000,000 LSD. Bayer Aspirin – I.G.
Daniel D. Adamas, Chief Exec. Founder of ADVANCED GENETIC SCIENCES, came directly from law office of Sullivan and Cromwell.
“DRASTIC MEASURES IN DISPUTE AIDS STUDY” San Francisco Chronicle – Examiner 2/9/86. Came out five days after Reagan plans for Pentagon, AIDS study, “prevention”.
1. Military will spend $12.5 million to prove AIDS casually transmitted.
2. The documents acknowledge, “This is in direct conflict with Constitution.”
3. Will forbid association between servicemen and high-risk groups.
4. Two scientific research organizations with history of military:
5. Both housed in Pacific Presbyterian Medical Center.
6. List of collaborators include two senior HOOVER INSTITUTION SCHOLARS.
Hoover Institute will be paid $336,000 to “assess legal, ethical and political considerations of AIDS CONTAINMENT.
7. Recommended “wearing Star of David arms bands”, like German Jews.
8. SEVERAL HUNDRED MILLION DEATHS COULD OCCUR IN NEXT 10 YEARS FORM AIDS.
TAPE NO. 742 FEBRUARY 24, 1986 – WORLD WATCHERS INTERNATIONAL
REAGAN'S KALLENGER 007, CAN'T SEND AIDES TO ROGERS' COMMISSION ON GROUNDS OF SEPARATION OF PRESIDENT AND CONGRESS. Warren commission protected Lyndon B. Johnson, murderers of JFK. Senate Select protected Richard Nixon, links to Dallas.
WORLD WATCHERS WILL REMAIN ON THE AIR, NO CUT-OFF IN JUNE.
I will continue on KAZU-FM and will continue tapes by subscription. The immediacy of events such as the Shuttle explosion, and Advanced Genetic Sciences moving into Monterey County, illustrate how important instant communication is between the radio audience, reporters, people concerned about all the various issues. You get the idea!! Thanks.
UP-DATE ON A FEW SHUTTLE ARTICLES.
"FORCES GO AWRY, FORM `ACCIDENT CHAIN', SHUTTLE TECHNOLOGY PITTED AGAINST HUMAN ERROR, WEATHER, POLITICS" Washington Post 2/9/86.
1. The technology was rigid, don't blast off in freezing temperature.
2. The error was ignoring instruction, taking orders from ABOVE.
3. Weather was always part of technology, fuel, seams, tiles, pipes.
4. Politics was using teacher to cover deficit, budgets, Star Wars.
DAN RATHER, CBS EVENING NEWS, FEBRUARY 18, 1986. "LAUNCH IN COLD WAS POLITICAL DECISION" Advice to delay because of freezing, "CANCELED".
"ENGINEERS DOUBT COLD CAUSED DISASTER" DC Times 2/7/86 (First day) Re-read their lies three weeks later, see how Rogers Commission worked Jesse Moore, now removed was set up, a devil's advocate" committee.
"OFFICIALS SEEM SURPRISED BY AGGRESSIVE QUESTIONS" New York Times 2/7/86
Albert D. Wheelon, senior vice-president Hughes Aircraft. Richard P. Feynman, professor, California Institute of Technology [These two, the hard inquiries]. Judson A. Lovingood, testifying propellant at 55 degrees without tests.
"TESTIMONY SO DRAMATIC AND U UNEXPECTED THEY AGREED PRESIDENT REAGAN SHOULD BE INFORMED" San Jose Mercury 2/15/86
Weather actually 6 degrees and 7 degrees. "What we don't know is who knew about those temperature readings?" (That is the big question. Did Reagan, Regan push this for January 28 speech?)
"PANEL LEADER `APPALLED' NASA MISSED KEY DATA. DECISION-MAKERS AT NASA DIDN'T GET KEY LAUNCH DATA" San Jose Mercury 2/19/86
This is the BIG LIE. Weather was on their minds all week and before. William P. Rogers will not allow Congressional representatives to his hearings on grounds of 'SEPARATION OF POWERS BETWEEN THE PRESIDENT AND CONGRESS". THIS COMMISSION IS TO COVER-UP THE PRESIDENT.
"WHITE NIGHT SOUGHT FOR DEMORALIZE SPACE AGENCY" Los Angeles Times 2/15/86
Reagan should look for Jim Jones or KISSINGER, HIS CENTRAL AMERICAN ADVISOR. Things couldn't get much worse. What about Daniel Graham, SCI?
"THE RIGHT STUFF' "New Woman" February 1986 "How Ordinary Teacher, Wife, Mother became the FIRST PRIVATE CITIZEN IN SPACE".
Another lie. There were lab scientists, "guests" from Taiwan, Saudi Arabia, Germany, etc. Two members of Congress.
Always the diary. Less Oswald, Sirhan Sirhan, Artie Bremer, John Hinckley, etc. "New Woman", 2/86, tells how Christa McAuliffe's diary "helped keep her alive. Her diary was a gusty move."
"CHAIN OF ERRORS DOOMED SHUTTLE, MANY FACTORS CONVERGED TO BRING ABOUT DISASTER. DESIGN FLAWS, COLD WEATHER ALL MAY HAVE LED TO TRAGEDY" Los Angeles Times 2/16/86
Tape #740 - 28 reasons Challenger was doomed. SDI vs. NASA, orders from above to "lift-off". NASA in-fighting. White House.
CONTINUED FROM #741, "DRASTIC MEASURES IN DISPUTE AIDS STUDY", PART II. San Francisco Examiner 2/9/86/
"Rhetoric of funding proposal is DESIRE TO SCARE MILITARY INTO FUNDS". "The proposal stresses the danger to military of female-to male." "Dr. Donald Francis, former chief of CDC's Aids Task Force, Atlanta, Georgia, currently working with California Department of Health and AIDS research and has been IDENTIFIED IN THE PROPOSAL TO THE MILITARY AS A MEMBER OF THE GROUP'S SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE".
"Studies could lead to SOCIAL ISOLATION OF VICTIMS OF AIDS OR OTHERS CONSIDERED AT RISK FOR THE DISEASE." Military would decide.
"BEHAVIORAL MODIFICATION research program could involve restriction on access of military personnel to certain HIGH RISK GROUPS".
"The possibility of quarantine for those exposed to AIDS is explored"
AIMS MEMO, ADVANCED INVESTIGATION OF MEDICAL SCIENCE GROUPS, "with a pandemic of catastrophic potential, would require state mandated registration of AIDS individuals, need and feasibility of quarantine, need for an feasibility of MANDATORY AND OVERT IDENTIFICATION, however LOATHSOME.
A STAR OF DAVID CONCEPT."
":The military's $40,000,000 research program received little scrutiny by Congress or NEWS MEDIA, since
IT WAS HURRIED THROUGH SEPT. 1985."
FORT DETRICK, MD, U.S. ARMY TESTS ON ELDERLY OR DEBILITATED, CALIFORNIA.
San Francisco Chronicle 7/8/84, Tape 657.
$1 BILLION GRAND FOR BIOMEDICINE New York Times 2/3/86
Hughes Medical Institute received all their funds from Hughes Military Aircraft. This money goes to Florida, then sent to places that can be used for chemical, biological warfare, genocide, Nazi-type exterminations. Some institutions, recipients of these funds, already linked to above.
"Next five years, $1 billion for MEDICAL RESEARCH". Not necessarily cures. "Largest share for 22 LABORATORIES, teaching hospitals, 14 states. Hughes Institute headquarters in Bethesda, MD." Naturally.
Dr. Donald S. Frederickson, president of the Institutes.
This $1 billion "will not touch a drop in their capital, no dip."
Institute created by Howard Hughes in 1953. Most of this research will be in four areas of specialization: genetics, immunology, metabolic control, neuroscience. Over $100 million in Boston Area: Massachusetts General Hospital, Children's Hospital, Bingham and Women's Hospital."
"Molecular genetics and sophisticated application of research to clinical problems, interaction between these to be tested."
"Application of new genetics research in reproductive biology."
"A new research facility will be built at Rockefeller University in New York,, used by Hughes Institute. Center at Yale."
Hughes Institute Labs will be at Columbia, New York City; Johns Hopkins, Baltimore; Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Washington University, St. Louis; Baylor, Houston; Vanderbilt, Nashville and Stanford University. Other programs in Pennsylvania, Chicago, Texas, Michigan, Washington, Utah, UCLA, San Diego and San Francisco.