Click. Princess Diana: The Cover-Up Turns Deadly.

Click. CIA Shuts Chat Room, Fires 4, Suspends 10.


Click. The Goring of Gore.

Princess Diana: The Cover-Up Turns Deadly

By Jeffrey Steinberg ©  Executive Intelligence Review - July 7, 2000

Nearly three years after the Paris car crash that claimed the lives of Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed, the cover-up of that tragedy has taken a deadly turn, prompting some experts to recall the pileup of corpses that followed the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. Over the course of four years, after President Kennedy was shot on
Nov. 22, 1963, at least 37 eyewitnesses and other sources of evidence about the crime, including one member of  the infamous Warren Commission, which oversaw the cover-up, died under mysterious circumstances.

On May 5, 2000, police in the south of France found a badly burned body inside the wreckage of a car, deep in the woods near Nantes. The body was so charred that it took police nearly a month before DNA tests confirmed that the dead man was Jean-Paul "James" Andanson, a 54-year-old millionaire photographer, who was among the paparazzi stalking Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed during the week
before their deaths.

From the day of the fatal crash in the Place de l'Alma tunnel, that killed Diana, Dodi, and driver Henri Paul, and severely injured bodyguard Trevor Rees-Jones, Andanson had been at the center of the controversy.

Mohamed Al-Fayed, the father of Dodi Fayed, and the owner of Harrods Department Store in London and the Paris Ritz Hotel, has labelled the Aug. 31, 1997 crash a murder, ordered by the British royal family, and most likely executed through agents and assets of the British secretintelligence service MI6--with collusion from French
officials, whose cooperation in the cover-up would have been essential.

At least seven eyewitnesses to the crash said that they saw a white Fiat Uno and a motorcycle speed out of the  tunnel, seconds after the crash. Forensic tests have confirmed that a white Fiat Uno collided with the Mercedes carrying Diana and Dodi, and that this collision was a significant factor in the crash. Several eyewitnesses told
police that they saw a powerful flash of light just seconds before the Mercedes swerved out of control and crashed  into the 13th pillar of the Alma tunnel. That bright light--either
a camera flash or a far more powerful flash of a laser weapon--was probably fired by the passenger on the back of the speeding motorcycle. Both the motorcycle and the white Fiat fled the crash scene, and police claim they have been unable to locate either vehicle, or identify the drivers or the passengers.

     - Andanson's White Fiat -

Andanson had been in and around Sardinia during the last week of August 1997, as Diana and Dodi vacationed in  the Mediterranean. He joined several dozen other paparazzi, who were stalking the couple's every move. He was back in France on Aug. 30, the day that Diana and Dodi flew to Paris. And that is where the facts about     Andanson's activities and whereabouts get very fuzzy.

For reasons that he never revealed, sometime before dawn on Aug. 31, 1997, less than six hours after the crash in the Alma tunnel, Andanson boarded a flight at Orly Airport near Paris, bound for Corsica. Andanson claimed that he was not in Paris earlier in the evening, when the crash occurred, but he never produced any evidence, save a  receipt for the purchase of gasoline elsewhere in France (which he could have doctored or obtained from another person), to prove he was not in the city.

His son James and his daughter Kimberly told police that they thought their father was grape-harvesting in the Bordeaux region. Andanson's wife Elizabeth claimed that she had been at home with her husband all night, at their country home, Le Manoir de la Bergerie, in Cher, until he abruptly left for Orly, at 3:45 a.m., to catch the   crack-of- dawn flight to Corsica.

Pressed on her version of the story, Mrs. Anderson later admitted to reporters and police that her husband was constantly on the run, and she could have been mistaken about the night in question. She told {The Express}, a British newspaper, "It was always very difficult to recall James's precise movements because he was always coming and going. The family was very used to that and so never paid a great deal of attention to the times he came and went."

What makes Andanson's precise itinerary the night of the fatal crash so vital is this: He owned and drove a white Fiat Uno. The car was repainted shortly after the Aug. 31, 1997 Alma tunnel crash, and was sold by Andanson in October 1997. And, although the official report of the French authorities investigating the crash concluded that      Andanson's car was not involved in the crash, French forensic reports made available to {The Express} told a  very different story.

One report in the files of Judge Herve Stephan, the chief investigating magistrate in the Diana-Dodi crash probe,  described the tests on Andanson's Fiat: "The comparative analysis of the infrared spectra characterizing the vehicle's original paint, reference Bianco 210, and the trace on the side-view mirror of the Mercedes shows that  their absorption bands are identical." In laymen's terms, the paint scratches from the Fiat found on the side-view  mirror of the Mercedes were identical to the paint samples taken from the matching spot on Andanson's Fiat.

The report continued: "The comparative analysis between the infrared spectra characterizing the black polymer  taken from the vehicle's fender, and the trace taken from the door of the Mercedes, show that their absorption bands are identical."

In short, despite the French investigators' endorsement of Andanson's alibi, the forensic tests strongly suggested that his car may have been {the} white Fiat Uno involved in the fatal crash.

John Macnamara, the Harrods director of security, and a retired senior Scotland Yard supervisor of investigations,  told reporters: "Mr. Andanson had for some time been a prime suspect who had relentlessly pursued Diana and  Dodi prior to their arrival in Paris. We have always believed that Andanson was at the scene and that more investigation should have been done into his possible involvement."

Macnamara added, "We believe that his death is no coincidence and that this is a line of inquiry which may help to discover the truth. Was Mr. Andanson killed because of what he knew? That is a question we want answered."

     - The `Suicide' Soap Opera -

Needless to say, Andanson's death stirred up renewed interest in Diana's death at a most inopportune time for the British royals, and those in France who abetted the cover-up. Sometime in September, an appellate court in Paris will rule on Al-Fayed's motion to order Judge Stephan to reopen the crash probe, based on the fact that Stephan shut down his probe before certain vital avenues of inquiry were fully explored, and in contradiction to his own  interim report, which cited several glaring paradoxes in theevidence that remained unresolved at the point that he abruptly closed down his investigation last year and blamed thecrash on driver Henri Paul.

For example, U.S. intelligence agencies, including the National Security Agency, the Central Intelligence Agency,  and the Defense Intelligence Agency, have all acknowledged, in response to Freedom of Information Act queries, that they have thousands of pages of documents on Princess Diana. Those documents, for the most part, remain under lock and key. In addition to those documents and other relevant evidence, it has been recently exposed that  a secret U.S.-U.K. joint surveillance program, code-named "Project Echelon," had apparently been involved in    round-the- clock monitoring of Princess Diana's telephone conversations, while she was at home in England and travelling around the globe.

Until the contents of these U.S. government files and electronic intercepts have been reviewed by French investigators, Al-Fayed's lawyers have argued, the probe cannot be considered complete. And the U.S. Justice Department continues to stonewall on indicting three Americans who were involved in an attempted $20 million extortion of Al-Fayed in April 1998, centered around purported "CIA documents" proving that British intelligence assassinated Diana and Dodi. While the "CIA documents["] seized
from one of the plotters have been confirmed to have been clever forgeries, questions remain about the accuracy of the content of the documents.

In a flagrant effort to dampen interest in the Andanson factor, the June 11 {Mail on Sunday}, a pro-royalist  tabloid, ran a story proclaiming "Wife's Affair Led to Paparazzi
Man's Car Blaze Suicide." The {Mail on Sunday}      dutifully peddled the French government's cover story: "The millionaire photographer who trailed Diana, Princess
of Wales in St. Tropez just days before her death, committed suicide when he discovered his wife was cheating on him, French police have revealed.... The eccentric millionaire--who was hailed by colleagues as one of the godfathers of paparazzi photography, and who flew a Union Flag over his house to show his love of Britain--was
facing a family crisis at the time of his death."

{Mail on Sunday} reporter Ian Sparks quoted an unnamed colleague of Andanson's at the Sipa Agency in Paris, making the preposterously contradictory claim that Andanson "was desperate to save his marriage. We would never have guessed he would do something so terrible."

He committed suicide to save his marriage!


A French police spokesman told Sparks, "He took his own life by dousing himself and the car with petrol and then setting light to it."

Andanson's widow Elizabeth, and their son James have rejected the idea that Andanson's death was suicide. Sources close to the family told {EIR} that they have pressed French officials to conduct a murder investigation into Andanson's death 400-miles from his home. The sources dismiss the bogus "marital problems" story and
additionally report that Andanson was in high spirits over his new job with the Sipa Agency.

     - The Plot Thickens -

Just after midnight on June 16, just one week after Andanson's death was first made public, three masked men  armed with handguns, broke into the Sipa office in Paris, shooting a security guard in the foot. The three assailants  dismantled all of the security cameras in the office, and proceeded to enter several specific offices, clearly aware of
exactly what they were looking for. They made off with several cameras, laptop computers, and computer hard drives.

Sipa's office employs more than 200 people, and operates 24-hours a day. The three invaders spent three hours in the office, holding other employees hostage. According to one of the hostages, the men were never concerned about the French police arriving at the scene. This hostage was convinced that the three "burglars" were themselves working for some branch of the French Secret Service. Furthermore, the source confirmed that Andanson had worked for French and, undoubtedly, British security

The owner of Sipa, Sipa Hioglou, has worked closely with French intelligence, and, not surprisingly, has been one of the primary sources of the "marital problems/suicide" cover story about Andanson's death, "confessing" to French police and reporters that Andanson had confided in him that he planned to take his own life. Hioglou, in the
days following the bizarre break-in and hostage siege of his office, also told police that he suspected that the raid was done on behalf of a disgruntled celebrity who was angry that her picture had been taken by a Sipa paparazzo without her permission.

In stark contrast, other Sipa employees have told the police that the idea that Andanson committed suicide was preposterous, and that they suspect that the break-in was related to his death.

     - What Is Going On? -

     The Sipa raid, the obvious work of French Secret Service assets, raises some very troubling questions. If Macnamara and Al-Fayed are right, and Andanson was at the crash site on Aug. 31, 1997, and his white Fiat was the car that collided with the Mercedes, what documentation existsof his presence at the tunnel? What      photographs exist of the crash scene, and what do they reveal? Was some of this material seized from the Sipa  offices in the recent break-in, to assure that it never sees the light of day?

     Evidence has recently come to light, that within hours of the crash, British and French secret service agencies carried out a series of similar break-ins at the homes and offices of several photo-agency personnel, in a desperate search [for] photos of the crash site that may have been transmitted in the hours immediately after the Alma tunnel collision, and before word of Princess Diana's death was made public.

     (EIR} has obtained copies of sworn statements from two London-based photographers, Darryn Paul Lyons and  Lionel Cherruault, which reveal that British intelligence was hyperactive in the hours immediately after the Alma tunnel crash, desperately seeking any revealing photographs that might have been spirited out of Paris.

     Lyons identified himself as the "Chairman of `Big Pictures,' ... an international photographic agency in London, New York, and Sydney, specializing in obtaining and selling unique and exclusive celebrity-based photographs."

     At 12:30 a.m. on Aug. 31, 1997, Lyons received a phone call from a Paris paparazzo, Lorent Sola, who said that he had a dozen photographs of the accident at the Alma tunnel. Sola offered to electronically transmit the photos  to Lyons immediately, and Lyons rushed off to his office, receiving the high-resolution photographs at  approximately 3 a.m. Lyons immediately began negotiating with several large news organizations in the United States and Britain to sell the pictures for

Lyons and Sola conferred after word of Diana's death was made public, and they decided to withdraw the offer of the pictures. Copies of the photos were placed in Lyons' office safe.

Sometime between 11 p.m. on Aug. 31 and 12:30 a.m. on Sept. 1, the electricity at Lyons' office was  mysteriously cut, although no other power outages in the office
building or the neighborhood occurred. Lyons,  convinced that either the office was being robbed, or bombed, called the police. In his sworn statement, Lyons declared that he believed that secret service agents had broken into his office and either searched the premises or planted surveillance and listening devices.

Lionel Cherruault, a photo London-based journalist for Sipa Agency, in his sworn statement, reported that, at 1:45  a.m. on Aug. 31, 1997, he received a call at his home from a freelance photographer in Florida, informing him that he was expecting to soon be in possession of photographs of the tunnel crash. Cherruault told the Florida contact
that he was interested. After word of Diana's death was announced, the deal fell through.

But Cherruault, who was in contact with his boss at Sipa, stated that, at approximately 3:30 a.m. on Sept. 1, while he and his wife and daughter were asleep, his home was broken into, his wife's car was stolen, and his car was moved. Computer disks used for transmitting photographs, and other electronic equipment, were stolen, and the front door of their home was left wide open. Even though cash, credit cards, and jewelry were visible in the study where the burglars stole the computer equipment, none of those valuables were taken, making it clear that this was not an ordinary break-in. The next day, a police officer came to Cherruault's home and confirmed that the break-in
was clearly the work of "Special Branch, MI5, MI6, call it what you like, this was no ordinary burglary." The officer said that the home had "been targetted." The man, whose name Cherruault was unable to recall, assured him "not to worry, your lives were not in danger," according to the sworn statement.

The official police report of the Cherruault break-in, which has been reviewed by {EIR}, confirmed that "The computer equipment stolen contained a huge library of royal
photographs and appears to have been the main target for the perpetrators."

     - Another Thread of the Cover-Up -

One of the other still-unresolved issues in the Alma crash probe, three years after the fact, revolves around the  medical evidence. Al-Fayed has been battling in court in Britain for the right to participate in the official inquest into the death of Princess Diana, arguing that since both Diana and Dodi died in the crash, therefore he should be
entitled to officially participate in both inquests. The courts have preliminarily ruled that he has the right to contest  the Royal Coroner's rejection of his participation in the Diana inquest, which will only occur after the French appellate process has been completed, sometime later this year.

However, in April of this year, the attorneys representing Al-Fayed received a copy of a suppressed memorandum, prepared by Professors Dominique Lecomte and Andre Lienhart, two French forensic pathologists working for Judge Stephan, suggesting that British authorities, including the Royal Coroner, Dr. Burton, had     interceded to conceal some aspects of the official British autopsy. The two French doctors were in London on June 23, 1998, where they met with British coroners Drs. Burton and Burgess, forensic pathologist Dr. Chapman, and Scotland Yard
Superintendant Jeffrey Rees. They were given copies of the English autopsy report on Princess Diana, but, according to their contemporaneous notes on the meeting, were told that the document was provided for their "private and personal use," and that it should not be included in the formal file of Judge Stephan.

Any material in that official investigative file was automatically made available to attorneys representing all the interested parties in the French probe, including Al-Fayed's attorneys.

This two-and-a-half year suppression of the Lecomte-Lienhart memorandum has once again raised serious questions about the legitimacy of the "official" autopsy of
the Princess of Wales, including questions that arose at the time of her death, as to whether she was pregnant.

The mayhem surrounding the deaths of Diana and Dodi, and now Andanson, raises questions about the circumstance in Paris on that night in late August 1997--questions that the House of Windsor in general, and  Prince Philip in particular, have long sought to suppress. The time may be fast approaching that the  well-orchestrated three-year cover-up is about to blow apart, and at least part of the truth about the death of the
"People's Princess" see the light of day.

And that is something that the Windsors and the mandarins of MI6 may not be able to survive.

     "A friend in Paris travels to work every day through the underpass in which Princess Diana died.  On the day of the incident she noticed all of the security cameras
were turned to the wall and actually mentioned it  to her husband. The next time they were allowed through the tunnel, the cameras were repositioned."
     B. NEWALL, Rochdale, Lancs. Letters page, the London Daily Mail,
February 2000.

Looks like these CIA terminations were the result of employees integrating
information to build a unique database.

CIA Shuts Chat Room, Fires 4, Suspends 10
By Vernon Loeb © Washington Post Staff Writer Friday, December 1, 2000; Page A02

The CIA yesterday fired four employees, suspended at least 10 others and revoked the security clearances of nine private contractors for exchanging "inappropriate" e-mail in computer chat rooms hidden from management.

The disciplinary action, described as the largest in the agency's history, followed a seven-month investigation that involved 160 employees and delved into activities going back 15 years.

While a public statement by the CIA stressed that the probe found no "unauthorized disclosure of classified information," a memo to all employees said investigators uncovered "a concerted and sustained effort on the part of a group of individuals to create, maintain and hide databases on the agency's computer systems."

The agency's statement said four employees, including one member of its Senior Intelligence Service--a cadre of career officers at the upper reaches of the civil service system--had been stripped of security clearances, "rendering them ineligible for continued CIA employment."

Eighteen others, including two SIS officers, received letters of reprimand. "Most of them will be suspended without pay for periods ranging from five to 45 days," the agency said.

Nine contractors, the statement said, also have been stripped of security clearances, meaning they cannot work on CIA contracts.

Seventy-nine other CIA employees with "minimal involvement" in the computer scheme received either warning letters or security briefings.

CIA spokesman Mark Mansfield said "every effort was made to understand and distinguish the role, knowledge and responsibility of each participant."

But former CIA employees with firsthand knowledge of the secret chat rooms argued that the disciplinary actions were an overreaction by CIA management.

Ross Stapleton-Gray, a former CIA analyst who participated in the covert communications channels when he worked at the CIA from 1988 to 1994, said
those involved were primarily computer-savvy employees who enjoyed a sense
of community with other "techies."

"I could be wrong, if some of these people were found to be in cahoots with [convicted CIA spy] Aldrich Ames," he said. "But the odds are pretty good that what this was, at worst, was bitching about management."

Another recent CIA retiree said those involved have been investigated far more aggressively than former CIA director John M. Deutch, who admitted drafting top-secret memos on unsecure home computers in 1995 and 1996.

Deutch was stripped of his security clearances only last year after a disgruntled security officer went to the CIA inspector general and complained that no disciplinary action had been taken against Deutch.

One senior intelligence official responded that senior CIA management felt compelled to take action because the organizers of the hidden chat rooms deliberately deceived their superiors. "The issue here," the official said, "is violation of trust," not just some "off-color" e-mail.

In its statement, the CIA said the first secret chat room was created as an "unofficial user's group" on the CIA's mainframe computer in the mid-1980s. "Over the years, as the agency migrated to new information systems, the hidden databases were moved to take advantage of these new systems," the statement said.

The memo to CIA employees, written by Robert McCants, the agency's security director, said "the group's leaders weighed whether their steps to evade security were adequate, alerted each other to leaks, and discussed whether it was time to panic when exposure was feared."

© 2000 The Washington Post Company


The following short quiz consists of 4 questions and tells whether you are qualified to be a "professional".  Scroll down for each answer.  The questions are not that difficult.

#1.  How do you put a giraffe into a refrigerator?

The correct answer is: Open the refrigerator, put in the giraffe and close the door.  This question tests whether you tend to do simple things in an overly complicated way.

#2.  How do you put an elephant into a refrigerator?  

The wrong answer is: Open the refrigerator, put in the elephant and close the refrigerator.
Correct Answer: Open the refrigerator, take out the giraffe, put in the elephant and close the door. This tests your ability to think through the repercussions of your actions.

#3.  The Lion King is hosting an animal conference.  All the animals attend except one.  Which animal does not attend?

Correct Answer: The Elephant.  The Elephant is in the refrigerator. This tests your memory.  OK, even if you did not answer the first three questions correctly, you still have one more chance to show your abilities.

#4.  There is a river you must cross.  But it is inhabited by crocodiles. How do you manage it?

Correct Answer: You swim across.  All the Crocodiles are attending the animal conference.  This tests whether you learn quickly from your mistakes.

According to Anderson Consulting Worldwide, around 90% of the professionals they tested got all questions wrong.  But many preschoolers got several correct answers.  Anderson Consulting says this conclusively disproves the theory that most professionals have the brains of a four year old.

November 30, 2000 NA (Network America) e-wire

The Goring of Gore

It's always fun to see your enemies skewed politically. And such is about to happen, is already happening, -- to that insufferable neo-Communist, Monopoly Capitalist, and all around Presidential dullard Gore.

We have repeatedly stated that the clues coming over the Big Media since July 2000 signal a W. Bush Presidency. How about an example from today?

Today CFR darling Colin Powell was trotted out next to W. Bush for a photo op. Amidst a few seconds of very awkward "for the camera" conversation, the media "demi-god" Powell congratulated Bush on his Presidential Victory. Bush thanked Powell more like he was receiving praise for a softball game well played than for winning the Presidency -which is one of those Dubya-isms the comedians are having such fun with.

But the point is this: Powell --- great New World Order Media demi-god that he is - was putting the Ruling Elite's imprimatur on Bush for all the nation to see. THIS is precisely the type of clue I am talking about.

At the same time, the liberal controlled media is starting to kill Gore with a thousand cuts - I mean - polls. The incessant polls are already rolling out that 60% of the people want Gore to quit, and so on. The polls will get worse.

And did you notice a VERY STRANGE thing about that Florida Supreme Court decision? Why did they only give the Democratic controlled counties in south Florida 6 days to count the ballots? Four of which were kind of traditional Holidays, namely Thanksgiving weekend? And why did the Democratic-packed Florida Supreme Court make the deadline SUNDAY evening? Why did they say that the deadline would be Monday IF the Secretary of State in Florida (Katherine Harris, aka Cruella GOP) was
not open for business on Sunday? You mean there has ever been a state Secretary of State's office open on Sunday? In other words, Florida extended the deadline, but put such an artificially cramped restriction on the ballot counters that it didn't do Gore much good.

Does anyone have an explanation for this strange aspect to the Florida Supreme Court decision -- other than that deals are being cut to give the rank and file Democrats the idea that the process is working out naturally and organically, while always weighting it for W. Bush?

Gore and Bush and their hardcore left allies are fighting the Big Boys' game plan, and I believe until a few days ago thought they might pull it off, but are now beginning to see the handwriting on the wall. To what extent Gore, W. Bush, Liebermann, et all realize that there is a Ruling Elite gameplan, I am not sure. I suspect they are both told to keep
going by their "illuminated" Ruling Elite advisors until the very end of each fight - to preserve as much real emotion as possible for public consumption. On the other hand, President Bush in 1992 seemed to be clearly aware that he was slated to lose. Remember, in 1992, with mega millions at his disposal, President Bush didn't even run a "Monday-night-before-the-election promo show", as did Perot and Clinton, and as had every major party Presidential candidate since at least 1968, as of that year.

Now the most likely scenario is that, following the certifying by Harris of the Bush victory ub Florida, the Florida State Legislature will sanction 25 electors to W. Bush on December 12. Then the Electoral College will meet on December 18th, and elect G. W. Bush. All the court actions will be submerged in the action of the Electoral College.

(In other words, all the illegal tampering in the process of absentee ballots that was done by Republicans in several counties -is going to be made irrelevant. This is no small matter -- because these ballots, if disqualified because of the citizen lawsuit a democrat partisan has now filed (and these ballots apparently should be disqualified) - would cost the Bush the victory in Florida. But the rule of law hasn't got in the way of the Ruling Elite's game plan in my adult lifetime, and it's not
about to now I wouldn't' think.)

Again, I have no inside sources. I just watch the Big Media clues, which are meant to prepare the American people for the "manufactured consent" which the Ruling Elite believe is necessary to hold the nation together, and to keep it moving their way. Let's see how it plays out.

Get ready! As soon as G. W. Bush starts to move, you are going to see a dizzying CONVOY - not of ballots --  but of moves for the Permanent Revolution and the emerging world government, still standing in the shadows. But for now, I give us all permission to enjoy the goring of Gore.

Jim Condit Jr.,
Director, Citizens for a Fair Vote Count

The "Ruling Elite", through their five Big TV Networks, AP wire service, and two major papers, the New York Times and Washington Post, are making peaceful change impossible at the ballot box, --  via Vote Fraud, Media Censorship, and Poll Fraud, and the flood of illegal aliens who are becoming registered voters . . . President Kennedy talked about this:
"If you make peaceful change impossible..... you make violent revolution inevitable." President John F Kennedy           

Go to to hear (or read the text) of the Radio Ads which are now airing over WLW Radio (which reaches into 38 states at night)and other stations -- exposing the easily rigged computerized elections which are about to "elect" the next President, and also exposing the coordinated news and censorship of the 5 Big TV Networks. Thanks to Ken Lowndes for Congress, the radio stations MUST air these ads. They're tough. They're "outrageous" -- and you've never heard anything like it on TV or Radio.

The three prongs of Big Media election manipulation are: Massive coverage of favored Candidates, and Censorship of all other candidates -- including warped Public Opinion Polls for months before the election; phony exit polls done by joint effort of the Big TV Networks on Election Day, and easily rigged computerized vote counting on election day -- which make the polls and exit polls come true. (On election day, the people are barred from touching or counting their ballots, the election officials are barred from knowing what is in the software program that instructs the computers how to count the votes.) (you can subscribe to this list by going to this website and signing in at the top near the topica logo, then answer confirming message) for a report about the recent Citizens for a Fair Vote Count Convention which took place Aug 25-27, 2000 and Action Steps. The Citizens for a Fair Vote Count Convention was a great success in launching the beginning of a nationwide network to restore honest elections. See special report at updated and improved website. Go to:

go to to read archived messages from this Network America e-wire in the "news" section under "news by month"

Read "Best of" Archives at at "Citizens for a Fair Vote Count" section accessed in left hand column of home page. Or see the end of the message to read all archives at

To contact us, reply to this message or send e-mail to:

To Subscribe to our daily ewire:
To Unsubscribe to our daily ewire:
Our mailing address: Citizens for a Fair Vote Count, PO Box 11339, Cincinnati, Ohio 45211

To read all current messages on the Network America listserve news service, do the following: 1) go to  2)if you have not yet done so, log in as a topica member which requires your e-mail address and a password you make up (this only need be done once)  3) then when you log in to, click on "my topica" at the top of the screen; then on 4) Network America, and then 5) click on "Read Current Messages" which is the top choice at the left column on that screen. (Note: in some cases you may find that you have skipped over the "my topica" screen and have been sent straight to the screen with the "Network America" choice.)

Please forward our messages to friends and opinion molders. The year 2000 Presidential Campaign offers an opportunity to de-stablize the New World Order Ruling Elite and restore honest elections with citizens checks and balances, true Freedom and true Free Enterprise in America.